In response to widespread concerns about the treatment of incarcerated youth, juvenile justice systems are deploying rehabilitation frameworks that claim to serve young people's best interests. But institutional rhetoric does not necessarily lead to institutional accountability. Because facilities can technically provide programming while concentrating resources among adjudicated youth and leaving pre-disposition youth without access, systems can claim compliance with rehabilitative mandates while exerting control over young people in ways that should cause grave concern.

​

Left unchecked and absent proactive intervention, these conditions will continue to obscure accountability, entrench racial disparity, and strip incarcerated youth of voice and agency. Stronger enforcement of existing rehabilitative mandates — and most fundamentally, new youth justice rights and standards — are necessary to protect young people from an expanding infrastructure of invisible control and institutional neglect.

​

In response, this brief — a collaboration between the Justice Education Project and UC Berkeley's Incarceration to College Program — synthesizes civic essays written by six youth incarcerated at Alameda County Juvenile Hall. Paired with concrete policy recommendations targeting active California and federal legislation, these findings offer a roadmap for reform grounded in the analysis of the young people the system claims to serve.